Kalios
← Home

FDA’s interim peptide compounding policy: what’s known, what isn’t

Checked

What is under review

On October 14, 2026, the White House Office of Management and Budget received a notice from HHS and FDA titled “Interim Access Policy for Compounding Using Certain Peptides” (RIN 0910-ZD94). OMB’s public record lists the stage as “Notice”, no legal deadline, and not economically significant. The record carries no text and names no substance (OMB’s record, reginfo.gov).

What a notice at OMB is, and isn’t

Before some agency documents are issued, OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs reviews them under Executive Order 12866. During a review, outside parties can ask to meet. Reginfo.gov lists six such meetings on this notice between October 21 and October 28, 2026, and does not list who attended (reginfo.gov, EO 12866 meetings for RIN 0910-ZD94). These are review meetings at OMB, not FDA meetings, hearings or announcements. Executive Order 12866 sets time limits for a review that can be extended at the agency head’s request (Executive Order 12866, section 6(b)(2)), and OMB’s record gives no end date for this one.

What people say it would do

The Associated Press, citing two people familiar with the plan, reported on October 15, 2026 that the plan is intended to let pharmacies temporarily compound some popular peptides (AP, October 15, 2026). The Washington Post, citing two unnamed people, reported on October 7 that the administration was crafting a plan to allow temporary sale of certain previously restricted peptides (The Washington Post, October 7, 2026). Law firms that follow FDA read it as pointing to an enforcement-discretion policy for pharmacy compounding under section 503A: a stated decision not to take action in stated circumstances (Holland & Knight, October 16, 2026; Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, October 2026, which adds that the title alone “does not establish the enforcement approach FDA intends to adopt”). None of this is the text. Kalios has not seen the text, and none of the reports cited here quotes it.

What a policy like this cannot do

An enforcement policy approves no drug. FDA’s own words for its existing Category 1 policy: FDA “does not intend to take action against a compounder for compounding drugs using bulk drug substances listed in category 1, provided that the conditions described in the guidance document are met.” (FDA, 503A bulk drug substances page, content current as of May 14, 2026) In Kalios’s plain-language reading, that is a statement about enforcement, not an approval, and the same reading would apply to any interim access policy. A policy about pharmacy compounding also says nothing about products sold as “research use only”: FDA’s 2026 warning letters to sellers of such products say the products “are unapproved new drugs under section 505(a)” whatever the label says (FDA warning letters, August 24, 2026: MARCS-CMS 735067, 734884, 733652, 735063, 735127; March 31, 2026: 721088, 721806, 721805, 721600, 721709). Those letters changed no compound’s legal status.

How we got here